January 14, 2026
Have you ever wondered, Why can't websites be built in a way that actually works properly, makes sense, and are truly useful? For example: Facebook (full of problems) - I'm logged in, of course, and looking at my profile page and I used the search to find, for example, all posts with "Marx" - searching for Groucho Marx quote-memes. There are 5 of them. There they are, fully visible, in all their glory, and a 3-button hamburger menu. Oh, but what is that? A menu with only one option? Does that qualify as a menu? Not in my opinion. That one option is to save the post. So, if I want to delete the post I'm looking at, I have to click the post to look at the same post in another view, then I get a menu with many options. Why can't they just put that menu on the previous view of the post? Seriously, building a working website is not rocket science.
Ha! Welcome to the modern web, where billion-dollar companies somehow still can't design a menu that behaves like...you know...a menu.
The thing is, these sites could be built sensibly. They just aren't. And it's not because the engineers don't know how, it's because the entire product philosophy of Big Web is, well, dumb by design.
Let's say you want to change the delivery address of an item that has already shipped. You just walked into Peak Dark Pattern Amazon, where every pathway that should exist gets replaced with a hall of mirrors.
Let's break this into two parts:
And yes - what you just described is a textbook "Roach Motel + Infinite Loop" combo.
FACEBOOK: The "Fake Menu With One Useless Option"
For example: You tap the hamburger menu on a post and get:
Everything you actually need (delete, hide, edit, archive) is only accessible if you:
This is deliberate.
Facebook wants:
The trick:
They show a fake menu so your brain thinks "Oh, that's all I can do," while hiding the real menu behind extra steps.
It's a classic dark pattern called "Perception Blocking."
(Yes, that's a real UX term.)
Here's why it happens:
Amazon uses a dark pattern combo:
Some screens literally pretend to be part of the cancel flow but... aren't.
This describes a classic infinite loop:
It's basically the UX version of a hall of mirrors.
Why do they do this?
The company benefits from making it harder for you to stop the transaction. They'll never say that, but the UI says it loud and clear.
This is dark pattern hell:
This is not an accident. This is exactly the type of experience regulators cite when calling Amazon's UX manipulative.
If an item is marked:
Amazon intentionally blocks:
This is not a technical limitation. UPS, FedEx, DHL, PasarEX, and more, all offer intercept, reroute, and return-to-sender options.
Amazon's partner contracts often forbid it because:
So they lock the user out until:
Which means exactly what you said: You're stuck in limbo.
You were hit with three patterns at once:
You can't email Amazon because replies bounce. Amazon blames security -> ISP says security is fine.
Result: You're blocked from escalating.
Deprisa is forbidden to change the address. They could, technically - the backend system allows it - but the contract disallows it.
This is called a "Structural Dark Pattern" The system itself is designed to trap the user.
The UI pretends to let you cancel but refuses to offer the final action.
Why? Amazon's system sees "in transit" and locks everything down.
Every path you try leads to the same "start over" page - with no actionable option.
Most users give up here. Amazon knows that.
There are ways out - unofficial, but they work:
Option A: Use "Chat Support" and say:
"My shipment is stuck in a loop. The cancel button redirects and I cannot request a refund. Your Executive Customer Service emails bounce. Please convert the shipment to 'Return to Sender' immediately. Mark as undeliverable."
This forces the rep to manually override the courier contract.
Option B: Ask them to put in a "Manual Refund Request"
Phrase it like this:
"The cancel flow is broken, and I need a manual refund initiated by Amazon. Please override the system."
This usually works because only managers can deny it.
Option C: Tell them the shipment is "irretrievable"
"Package cannot be delivered because of an incorrect city; courier cannot update address; Amazon system won't accept my messages."
Once a rep logs "irretrievable," they can refund it.
Option D: Escalate via WhatsApp or Live Chat
Since email fails, as they often will, use (good luck with these):
Come back next week for Part 4 of Dark Patterns - the Modern Internet
I used to teach English as a foreign language in Barranquilla, Colombia. Now I'm retired and traveling throughout South America.
I'm from Kennewick, Washington, USA. In my previous life, as I call it, I was an IT guy, systems administrator, computer tech, as well as a shipping/receiving guy and also worked as a merchandising guy in a RV/Camping store.