January 7, 2026
Have you ever wondered, Why can't websites be built in a way that actually works properly, makes sense, and are truly useful? For example: Facebook (full of problems) - I'm logged in, of course, and looking at my profile page and I used the search to find, for example, all posts with "Marx" - searching for Groucho Marx quote-memes. There are 5 of them. There they are, fully visible, in all their glory, and a 3-button hamburger menu. Oh, but what is that? A menu with only one option? Does that qualify as a menu? Not in my opinion. That one option is to save the post. So, if I want to delete the post I'm looking at, I have to click the post to look at the same post in another view, then I get a menu with many options. Why can't they just put that menu on the previous view of the post? Seriously, building a working website is not rocket science.
Ha! Welcome to the modern web, where billion-dollar companies somehow still can't design a menu that behaves like...you know...a menu.
The thing is, these sites could be built sensibly. They just aren't. And it's not because the engineers don't know how, it's because the entire product philosophy of Big Web is, well, dumb by design.
Okay, buckle up, because you're going for a ride.
Dark patterns are the sleazy little psychological tricks baked into websites and apps to make you do things you didn't intend to do - or to stop you from doing what you do want.
They're everywhere… because they work.
Here's the no-sugarcoat tour.
A "dark pattern" is a design choice that looks like UX but acts like manipulation. It nudges, tricks, or forces the user into behaviors that benefit the company at the user's expense.
Think:
Modern Big Tech uses them like seasoning. Sprinkle generously, stir, serve warm.
Easy to get in. Nearly impossible to get out.
Examples:
Goal: Make staying easier than leaving.
Something that should be there...just isn't.
You see this on Facebook:
Why?
Because if deletion were easy, people would delete more.
Deletion = less data = fewer ads = less profit.
You try to do X, and the site keeps funneling you back to Y.
Example:
This is strategic annoyance.
Making you feel guilty for choosing the option they don't want.
Examples:
Buttons labeled:
This is manipulation disguised as "fun."
Color, spacing, and visual hierarchy used to steer you subtly.
Classic moves:
You think you're choosing freely.
You're actually being herded like a sheep with a UI stick.
Stuff designed so you click the wrong thing by habit.
Examples:
This is intentional.
UX designers know exactly what they're doing.
Doing the thing you want requires:
Meanwhile, adding new features or subscribing is one click.
Funny how that works.
The tactic: annoy you until you surrender.
They literally train you like a dog.
You think something is free... until the final page.
Examples:
This one's basically legal fraud with good PR.
Privacy-friendly settings hidden or auto-enabled:
The user must work HARD to protect themselves.
The company makes it effortless to leak your data everywhere.
Dark patterns erode:
But they boost:
Which is why Big Tech keeps using them even when users complain.
If you built a website with these tricks, people would call you an asshole.
When Facebook does it, it's called "industry-standard UX."
Come back next week for Part 3 of Dark Patterns - the Modern Internet
I used to teach English as a foreign language in Barranquilla, Colombia. Now I'm retired and traveling throughout South America.
I'm from Kennewick, Washington, USA. In my previous life, as I call it, I was an IT guy, systems administrator, computer tech, as well as a shipping/receiving guy and also worked as a merchandising guy in a RV/Camping store.